Connect with us

Politics

Speaker, Femi Gbajabiamila Speaks About Ills Of Social Media & Freedom Of Speech

Published

on

Speaker of the House of Representatives, Rep. Femi Gbajabiamila, has given his opinion concerning the use of social media and the right to freedom of speech.

He stated that tackling hate speech and misinformation has become the responsibility of all major stakeholders, especially Parliaments around the world, as the negative consequences of the two can only be imagined.

Gbajabiamila said parliaments must find in all regulatory or legislative interventions, a balance between protecting the right to free speech and the right to life, peace and dignity.

Femi Gbajabiamila on hate speech
Femi Gbajabiamila on hate speech via social media

According to him, proper and legal means should be followed in countering hate speech and misinformation both off and online so as not to tamper with the rights of citizens to free expression.

The Nigerian House of Rep speaker spoke on Tuesday on the topic, ‘Countering Misinformation and Hate Speech On and Offline Requires Stronger Regulations’, at the Fifth World Conference of Speakers of Parliament taking place in Vienna, Austria.

He said technology and new media had led to the democratisation of public debate in a way that, if appropriately managed, could be to the benefit of citizens and nations worldwide.

However, he noted that “this is not to suggest that governments should be in the business of deciding who gets to speak or what amounts to proper speech.

“However, when it is clear that speech has had negative consequences, it falls to the government to define the criminal and civil processes for accountability.

“To do otherwise will be an abdication of the role of government in a free society, and that is not only unacceptable but also a dereliction of duty.

“Parliaments must lead from the front in tackling this scourge or we all shall pay a heavy price.

“Coming to Nigeria, Gbajabiamila said with the country’s diverse cultures and religions that were still working toward achieving a more perfect union, hate speech off and online could have a devastating real-world effect very quickly.

“Therefore, for us, countering misinformation through proper and legal means is not a theoretical question but a moral and constitutional responsibility. It is a matter that goes to the heart of our ability to continue to exist as one nation in peace, unity and prosperity”, he explained.

The Speaker cautioned that “we must be aware of the danger that lies in trying to prevent the worst consequences of misinformation and hate speech, as some State interventions can also go too far in ways that smother the marketplace of ideas and impinge on human rights and fundamental freedoms.

“Our cause, therefore, is the creation of legal systems, processes and protocols that allow for free expression and robust debate in society; yet remain capable of identifying and holding to account those who seek to abuse the rights we hold dear and subvert our societies for their narrow interests, through the scourge of choreographed and mischievously curated misinformation off and online.”

Gbajabiamila cited the examples of the misinformation on the Control of Infectious Diseases Bill introduced in the House last year; the protests against Covid-19 vaccination around the world, and the problem of racism against some footballers in the UK.

Other speakers of Parliaments that spoke at the session supported the idea of regulating the space for hate speech and misinformation while emphasising the need to protect freedom of expression.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

%d bloggers like this: